Superlatives
"Best Essay" is awarded to Blindly Consuming.
This is my best essay because it is incredibly thorough. I was very passionate about the topic being discussed.I have serval real world examples throughout the paper as evidence to support and better explain my ideas. I found away to go beyond the everyday vocabulary and expand on the word usage in my writing by using a vivid vocabulary. Lastly, the definition is a proper and suiting one for the topic chosen, meaning the essay it's self was interesting and excelled it's original propose.
"Most Improved" is awarded to Feminist vs. Meninist.
The essay had begun as challenge and continued to be one even when it was turned in. I was able to go further with it after receiving a grade and developing it even after the critics Mrs.Erskine, who is incredibly beautiful and amazing, granted me with. This had original being a jumble of ideas, but now after applying the corrections and as presented today is a clear comparison with improve grammar and mechanics.
"Most Difficult to Write" is, of course, granted to the research paper, Sweatshops: The Causes and Effects.
The length of this paper was a major challenge do to having to discuss one topic for such an extended period of time. This was also extremely challenging due to the new methods of research. This through research allowed for a better understanding for the topic, but also posed difficulty in attempting to take all the information discovered and present it in a way that is logical and beneficial for the purpose of my piece.
"Most Helpful Peer Review" is given to the constructive criticism granted by Below the Surface.
This peer review was very helpful. the questions were able to lead the reviewer in assisting me achieve the best writing possible. The questions forced them to go in depth to the writing, which allowed me to also revaluate. The requirement to list the similes in the paper allowed me to understand if the writing, since descriptive, had a good amount of figurative language. Other helpful aspects were the two specific suggestions to help improve, which helped me realize I had no described the sense of touch very vividly in my original draft, so I was able to expand on that for my present draft,
"Best Essay" is awarded to Blindly Consuming.
This is my best essay because it is incredibly thorough. I was very passionate about the topic being discussed.I have serval real world examples throughout the paper as evidence to support and better explain my ideas. I found away to go beyond the everyday vocabulary and expand on the word usage in my writing by using a vivid vocabulary. Lastly, the definition is a proper and suiting one for the topic chosen, meaning the essay it's self was interesting and excelled it's original propose.
"Most Improved" is awarded to Feminist vs. Meninist.
The essay had begun as challenge and continued to be one even when it was turned in. I was able to go further with it after receiving a grade and developing it even after the critics Mrs.Erskine, who is incredibly beautiful and amazing, granted me with. This had original being a jumble of ideas, but now after applying the corrections and as presented today is a clear comparison with improve grammar and mechanics.
"Most Difficult to Write" is, of course, granted to the research paper, Sweatshops: The Causes and Effects.
The length of this paper was a major challenge do to having to discuss one topic for such an extended period of time. This was also extremely challenging due to the new methods of research. This through research allowed for a better understanding for the topic, but also posed difficulty in attempting to take all the information discovered and present it in a way that is logical and beneficial for the purpose of my piece.
"Most Helpful Peer Review" is given to the constructive criticism granted by Below the Surface.
This peer review was very helpful. the questions were able to lead the reviewer in assisting me achieve the best writing possible. The questions forced them to go in depth to the writing, which allowed me to also revaluate. The requirement to list the similes in the paper allowed me to understand if the writing, since descriptive, had a good amount of figurative language. Other helpful aspects were the two specific suggestions to help improve, which helped me realize I had no described the sense of touch very vividly in my original draft, so I was able to expand on that for my present draft,